Working for International Dialogue and Peace


Leave the Houthis Alone! Why are we on the same side as the Saudis – and al Qaeda – in Yemen?

by Justin Raimondo (source: Antiwar.com) March 27, 2015

Saudi Arabia‘s US-backed aggression against the sovereignty of Yemen is a textbook example of how local conflicts are internationalized – and become tripwires for regional wars and even global conflagrations. ››read more


No Proxy War: Saudi Invasion of Yemen Just Flat Out Aggression

by Jason Ditz (source: Antiwar.com) March 27, 2015

Ever mindful of the public relations campaign, Saudi officials, and their US backers, are presenting the Saudi attack on Yemen as part of a “proxy war” against Iran.

Relatively recent claims that the long-standing Houthi rebellion in northern Yemen are receiving some unspecified “aid” from the Iranian government are being presented unquestioned as the pretext for a Saudi invasion, but are a flimsy pretext indeed. ››read more


Anti-Muslim Bias, Racism, and America’s Iran Debate

by Hillary Mann Leverett (source: Going to Tehran) March 24, 2015

Appearing on RT’s CrossTalk, click on the video above or see here and (for YouTube) here, Hillary explored the anti-Muslim bias and even outright racism driving some aspects of the opposition to a prospective Iran nuclear deal here in the United States. (Her foil on this point was Fred Fleitz, former CIA analyst who established his neoconservative foreign policy credentials as chief of staff to John Bolton and Bob Joseph during their tenures as Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.) ››read more


Netanyahu’s misrepresentation of Iran

by R. K. Ramazani (source: Daily Progress) March 23, 2015

What Netanyahu wants is to have no deal whatsoever.
That is why President Obama has undertaken to deal with Iran carefully and patiently. He is trying to test Iran by considering what Iran might accept and what the United States could consent to. Netanyahu wants new crippling American sanctions on Iran that could possibly lead to a catastrophic war. ››read more


Iran Nuclear: The ‘Legally Non-Binding’ Flawed Argument

by Kaveh Afrasiabi (source: EuroAsia) March 17, 2015

In response to the recent letter by Republican U.S. Senators to Iran, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif has questioned the letter’s core argument regarding the future reversibility of any final nuclear deal by stating that any future U.S. move to revoke or modify the deal would be deemed a violation of international law since “it will not be a bilateral agreement between Iran and the US, but rather one that will be concluded with the participation of five other countries, including all permanent members of the Security Council, and will also be endorsed by a Security Council resolution.” ››read more


Israelis are Treating Jihadis, Too

by Jim Lobe (source: Lobelog) March 15, 2015

Israel was not only providing medical treatment to fighters, but also “[i]t’s a channel of communication ….they’re talking to them and likely sharing intelligence in the full knowledge that these rebel units cooperate with Nusra against the Assad regime, Hezbollah, and the IRGC.” ››read more


Iran Responds to GOP Letter

(source: UN Mission of Iran) March 10, 2015

The Iranian Foreign Minister added that “change of administration does not in any way relieve the next administration from international obligations undertaken by its predecessor in a possible agreement about Iran’s peaceful nuclear program.” He continued “I wish to enlighten the authors that if the next administration revokes any agreement with ‘the stroke of a pen,’ as they boast, it will have simply committed a blatant violation of international law.” ››read more


The Strategic Impact of U.S.-Iranian Rapprochement

by Hillary Mann Leverett (source: Going to Tehran) March 10, 2015

“[President Obama] has gone down this road of negotiations—real, serious, intense negotiations—with Iran, in some ways taking a page from my book, [Going to Tehran]: that the only way you can really deal with a rising Iran is to have constructive relations with it. President Obama is seriously engaged in that prospect, to have a constructive relationship with Iran. He can’t just have it by coming to a good agreement with Iran. He’s going to have to break crockery and actually tell the Israelis that it’s just a good [U.S.] relationship with Iran. It’s going to be a different sort of [U.S.] relationship with Israel. That, potentially is revolutionary for the United States, and could be enormously productive… ››read more


The Long History of Israel Gaming the ‘Iranian Threat’

by Gareth Porter (source: Middle East Eye) March 6, 2015

Western news media has feasted on Prime Minister Netanyahu’s talk and the reactions to it as a rare political spectacle rich in personalities in conflict. But the real story of Netanyahu’s speech is that he is continuing a long tradition in Israeli politics of demonizing Iran to advance domestic and foreign policy interests. ››read more


Full Interview With Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif

by Mohammad Javad Zarif (source: NBC) March 5, 2015

Iran's Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, spoke with NBC News' Ann Curry Wednesday. Below is the complete interview: ››read more


Why Iran's rise is a good thing

by Hillary Mann Leverett (source: CNN) March 5, 2015

In September 2002, then-former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a U.S. congressional committee "there is absolutely no question whatsoever" that Saddam Hussein's Iraq was developing nuclear weapons at "portable manufacturing sites of mass death." Once Hussein had nuclear weapons, Netanyahu warned, "the terror network will have nuclear weapons," placing "the security of the entire world at risk."

Fast forward to this week, and Netanyahu was back, this time as prime minister, to make virtually identical claims about Iran. Yet not only has the U.S. intelligence community disagreed with Netanyahu's assessment of Iranian nuclear intentions, so does Israel's, according to leaked documents. Indeed, more than 200 retired security officers have publicly criticized Netanyahu as a danger to Israel's security. Sadly, Netanyahu's presentation reinforces caricatures regularly advanced by American and Gulf Arab pundits -- caricatures of Iran as aspiring Middle Eastern hegemon, bent on overthrowing an otherwise stable regional order. It's a misguided perspective that is actually hurting the United States. ››read more


        Editor's note: Hillary Mann Leverett, co-author of "Going to Tehran: Why America Must Accept the Islamic Republic of Iran," served at the National Security Council under Presidents Clinton and Bush.

Netanyahu’s Politics Of Hysteria

by Kaveh L. Afrasiabi (source: Eurasia Review ) March 5, 2015

On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a much-anticipated speech before a partially vacant US Congress, notwithstanding the boycott by a large cross-section of lawmakers, that ought to give big shivers to George Orwell in his grave. Leading a rogue nuclear state that refuses the slightest inspection of its clandestine nuclear facilities, Netanyahu was perhaps looking in the mirror when he jotted down the line accusing Iran of “sparking a nuclear arms race in the Middle East” or harboring “voracious appetite for aggression,” given Israel’s long history of aggression against its Arab neighbors. ››read more


Netanyahu Speech Failed: Senators Withdrawing Support From Iran Bill

by Jason Ditz (source: Antiwar.com) March 5, 2015

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enjoyed a minor boost in his polling for the upcoming election, but to the extent that his speech to the US Congress was an effort to kill US diplomacy with Iran, it appears to have failed, and support for the bill is drying up. ››read more


Netanyahu’s Nuclear Deceptions

by GHOLAMALI KHOSHROO (source: NY times) March 4, 2015

In our view, Mr. Netanyahu has consistently used these false alarms and outlandish claims both to serve his domestic political maneuvering and to create a smoke screen that relegates the Palestinian question to the margins. We have noted how his rhetoric has intensified in proportion to the international pressure on Israel to stop the settlement activity and end the occupation of the Palestinian territory.

The paradox of the situation is that a government that has built a stockpile of nuclear weapons, rejected calls to establish a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East, made military incursions into neighboring states and flouted international law by keeping the lands of other nations under occupation, now makes such a big fuss over a country, Iran, that has not invaded another country since America became a sovereign nation. ››read more


        Editor's note: Gholamali Khoshroo is Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations.

Netanyahu Threatens War In Speech to Congress

by Phyllis Bennis (source: Common Dreams) March 4, 2015

The threat to nuclear non-proliferation in the Middle East was issued long ago—not by Iran, but by Israel’s own internationally known but carefully denied nuclear arsenal. It is Israel, not Iran, whose hundreds of nuclear weapons threaten a potential nuclear arms race in the region, threaten its neighbors, and threaten the world. ››read more


Survey Shows Strong Majority Support for Obama Approach on Iran

by Jim Lobe (source: Lobelog) March 4, 2015

According to a new poll, a strong majority of the U.S. public supports an agreement that would limit Iran’s enrichment capacity and impose highly intrusive inspections on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of sanctions against the Islamic Republic. The survey was released Tuesday as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tried to persuade Congress to derail such a deal. ››read more


Background on False Lavizan-3 Story

by Jeffrey Lewis (source: Arms Control Wonk) March 3, 2015

RajaviRajaviI’ve got a new column coming out on the allegation that Iran has a covert enrichment site in the Tehran suburbs called “Lavizan-3.” Along with Paul-Anton Krüger, I tracked down someone who actually visited the site recently. It is precisely what Iran says it is: a facility to make identification documents. NCRI is full of it. ››read more


Saudis Said to Aid Israeli Plan to Bomb Iran

by Robert Parry (source: Consortiumnews) March 1, 2015

As the Obama administration is rushing to complete a nuclear agreement with Iran and reduce regional tensions, the Israeli media is reporting on a deal with Saudi Arabia to let Israeli warplanes transit Saudi airspace en route to bombing Iran, reports Robert Parry. ››read more


STATE DEPT. RULES OUT IRAN “SECRET NUCLEAR FACILITY” LAVIZAN-3 ALLEGATIONS PUSHED BY CONGRESSMEN–CLAIMS APPEAR FABRICATED

(source: The District Sentinel) February 28, 2015

Rajavi and SaddamRajavi and Saddam“We have seen these claims and while we take all such reports seriously, we do not believe that this allegation has merit or that it impacts our ongoing negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program,” a State Department official told The Sentinel.

“We have examined the report and have no information to support the conclusion reached by the group that made the allegations,” the official added, noting that the multilateral nuclear negotiations involving Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council “are taking into account the possible pathways to enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon, and a comprehensive agreement will address those pathways.” ››read more


U.S. casts doubt on secret Iran nuke facility

by Oren Dorell (source: USA Today) February 27, 2015

GMP safe product photoGMP safe product photoAn uncropped version of that photo was posted Feb. 12 to the website of GMP Safes, an Iranian vault-door manufacturer, which shows the door sitting in a large room above ground, with sunlight streaming in from windows.

David Albright, a nuclear expert who is president of the Institute for Science and International Security, said the cropped photo adds to legitimate questions about NCRI's allegations.

"The basic story raises questions about its authenticity. They may have answers but the questions raise further doubts," Albright said. "The claims are so controversial that any manipulated evidence casts doubt on the whole story." ››read more