[home][about][contact] [getting involved] [Educational][Academic] [Media Watch][Views]
UK's ex-Ambassadore to IAEA slams anti-Iran positions
Former UK Ambassador to the IAEA, Peter Jenkins, reacts to Albright calling Joyner "the Ayatollah's Lawyer" by pointing out some of the "misrepresentations" and "contentious interpretations" promoted about Iran's nuclear program:
"Misrepresenting evidence has been a recurrent feature of the last ten years. In 2002, for instance, we claimed that Iran had no intention of declaring the Natanz enrichment plant because no declaration had been made before construction began; yet at that time Iran was only obliged to declare plants 180 days before the introduction of nuclear material...
"As for contentious interpretations, they are too numerous to list. One of the most egregious, though, is the claim that Iran may not enrich because it is in non-compliance with the NPT. Not only would an impartial court (if such existed) be challenged to determine that Iran has been in NPT non-compliance since its pre-2004 safeguards failures were corrected; but the NPT is without provision for the forfeiting of rights, and in the 2003-5 period the Europeans fully accepted that Iran’s suspension of enrichment was a voluntary confidence-building measure, not an obligation, as did the IAEA Board of Governors."